From Victor Osula, Abuja
Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, has filed a fundamental Rights Enforcement suit against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
The suit, filed through his lawyer, Darlington Ozurumba, before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of a Federal High Court in Abuja, alleges a threat by the anti-graft agency to arrest, detain and prosecute him after his tenure as governor on May 29, 2027.
Marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/773/2024, dated and filed on June 6, Governor Sanwo-Olu in his originating summons, is seeking a declaration that under and by the provisions of Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution, as a citizen of Nigeria, he is “entitled to right to private and family life as a minimum guarantee encapsulated under the Constitution of the Republic of Nigeria, 1999 before, during and after occupation of public office created by the Constitution.”
The Governor is praying the court to declare that under and by virtue of the provisions of Sections 43 and 44(1) of the 1999 Constitution, he is entitled to acquire, own, operate and manage both moveable and immovable property including bank accounts, “as a minimum guarantee encapsulated under the constitution either before, during and after leaving public office of governor of a state”.
He is also praying the court to declare that upon community reading of the provisions of Sections 35(1) & (4) and 41(1) of the constitution, the threat of his investigation, arrest and detention by the EFCC during his tenure of office as governor is illegal.
The Governor contended that the plan to arrest him was unconstitutional and a flagrant violation of his fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement as guaranteed under Sections 35(1) & (4) and 41(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
He, therefore, prayed the court to declare that the incessant harassment, threat of arrest and detention, against him upon the EFCC’s instigation by his political adversaries based on false and politically motivated allegations of corruption is a misuse of executive powers and abuse of public office.
Governor Sanwo-Olu further prayed the court to declare it as an unwarranted Interference with his fundamental right to personal liberty, freedom of movement, fair hearing and equal protection of the law as guaranteed by the Constitution and the Africa Charter on Human & Peoples’ Rights, CAP A9 LFN 2004.
He prayed to the court for an order restraining the EFCC from harassing, intimidating, arresting, detaining, interrogating or prosecuting him in connection with his tenure as the governor of Lagos State.
In addition, the Governor prayed the court to make an order prohibiting and restraining the commission “from seizing the properties, the international passport and travel documents of the plaintiff or freezing the bank accounts of the plaintiff, his family members or in any other way to further breach the plaintiff’s fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.”
He urged the court to make an order restraining the EFCC from inviting, arresting or detaining him in connection with his tenure as governor of the state or breaching his fundamental rights to personal liberty, fair hearing, private and family life, freedom of movement, acquisition of moveable and immoveable property as enshrined in the laws
In the affidavit in support of the originating summons deposed to by Martha Kanu, a litigation secretary in the law firm, the lawyer said she was informed of the facts by the governor at a teleconference meeting which she believed to be true.
She alleged that as a way of getting at the governor, the EFCC was now making a surreptitious plan to arrest some of his aides and family members based on the false and spurious allegations of diversion of funds.
Kanu alleged that the officials of the commission were now mounting pressure on some of the aides of the governor to come and make incriminating statements against him.
She also alleged that the anti-graft agency was also threatening to go after some contractors handling projects for the state government, adding that the anti-graft agency was compelling them to make statements that would implicate the Governor of corruption as part of the orchestrated contrivance to build up a trump up a case against him.
According to her, in a malicious attempt to get at the plaintiff, some of the plaintiff’s political adversaries in conjunction with some of the officials of the defendant are falsely ascribing to his administration of corrupt practices which are non-existent.
She alleged that the EFCC, through some of its officials, were desperately inventing false, spurious and malicious allegations against the governor to use the same as a basis for investigating, arresting and prosecuting him after leaving office as governor.
Meanwhile, the matter which came up for hearing earlier Tuesday, has been adjourned until Nov. 11.
