The Agony of A Presidential Spokesperson, Daniel Bwala

 

 

 

Daniel Bwala, Special Adviser to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Media and Policy Communication, has declared that his primary responsibility is to defend the policies and programmes of the Tinubu administration anywhere in the world.

He criticised what he described as “opposition research-style journalism” during his recent interview with journalist Mehdi Hasan.

Bwala made the remarks in a statement issued on Saturday in response to widespread reactions on social media following the interview, which has generated mixed responses within the last 24 hours.

According to him, he was fully aware of the responsibilities attached to his appointment when he accepted the role from President Tinubu, stressing that promoting and defending the administration’s policies remains central to his mandate.

“When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications,” Bwala said, adding that he is always ready to appear before any interviewer anywhere in the world to articulate and defend the government’s positions.

The presidential aide explained that the interview was arranged after the Head to Head programme reached out to him months earlier, stating that the discussion would focus on key national issues such as security, the economy, and corruption.

However, Bwala said he was surprised when the host raised questions about his past political statements, noting that such a line of questioning had not been disclosed during nearly six months of communication preceding the interview.

“Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response,” he stated.

Bwala further alleged that some of the quotes attributed to organisations and groups during the interview were inaccurate, insisting that a number of them amounted to fake news.

He also addressed criticisms surrounding his previous remarks about President Tinubu when he was in the opposition, describing them as part of normal political contestation.

Bwala noted that political alignments often evolve, citing examples from global politics where individuals who once criticised leaders later worked with them in government.

The presidential aide dismissed the criticisms from opposition figures and their supporters, saying their reactions were driven by political interests and would not distract him from his responsibilities.

He also thanked Nigerians and others who sent messages commending his performance during the interview, which he described as a difficult engagement in which the interviewer frequently interrupted his responses.

Despite the controversy, Bwala expressed admiration for Hasan, describing him as one of the most formidable debaters in global media, and said he looks forward to participating in a second part of the Head to Head interview.

According to him, the next engagement would provide an opportunity to focus more on the policies, programmes, and achievements of the Tinubu administration.

The statement read: “In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight.

“When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies.

“I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me.

“Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me.

“I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day.

“As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know.

“The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki”

“I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative.

“I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far.”